Beyond names
An identifier, location or combination of details can identify someone. Assess the available context, not an isolated field.
ICO offers a useful criterion: information relates to a person identifiable directly or indirectly. This is the UK regulator’s framework, not a statement of Azerbaijani law.
An identifier, location or combination of details can identify someone. Assess the available context, not an isolated field.
ICO’s example remains pseudonymisation when the organisation can reconnect codes to people. That differs from effectively anonymised information.
FinFly recommends checking what a partner could match your table against before sharing it. Record who retains the code-to-person mapping separately.
A definition frames the question but does not establish whether collection or sharing is lawful. Check the relevant jurisdiction; ICO also flags its guidance as under review.
Not necessarily. Other details or combinations may still identify people.
The explainer is checked against these institutional and industry sources. Links open the original material.